Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05840
Original file (BC 2013 05840.txt) Auto-classification: Approved


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:             DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-05840
		COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED:  NO



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active 
Duty, item 11, Primary Specialty, reflect M46A3, Medical Service 
Specialty, Nursing Administrator, 8 years; M46S3, Medical 
Service Specialty, Operating Room Nurse, 17 years; and 46N3, 
Clinical Nurse, 3 years.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Her primary specialty on her DD Form 214 is incorrect.

The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 31 October 2013, the applicant was relieved from active duty 
and retired on 1 November 2013, in the grade of lieutenant 
colonel under the provisions of AFI 36-3203 (Vol Retirement: 
Sufficient Service for Retirement).  She served 28 years and 
18 days of active service.

The applicant’s DD Form 214 with a separation date of 31 October 
2013, item 11, Primary Specialty, reflect M46A3, Medical Service 
Specialty, Nursing Administrator, 1 year; M46S3, Medical Service 
Specialty, Operating Room Nurse, 25 years; and 46N3, Clinical 
Nurse, 2 years.


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIC recommends partial relief.  DPSIC states the 
applicant’s DD Form 214, item 11, should read 46S3, Operating 
Room Nurse, 19 years and 2 months; 46N3, Clinical Nurse, 5 years 
and 11 months and 46A3 Nursing Administration, 2 years and 
10 months.

AFI 36-2101, Classifying Military Personnel (Officer and 
Enlisted), paragraph 3.1 provides Air Force policy on duty AFSC 
determination: “Designating a Duty AFSC (DAFSC).  A DAFSC, 
including prefixes, suffixes, and skill levels, must match the 
authorized unit manpower document (UMD) position.  An officer’s 
DAFSC must match an awarded AFSC, either entry, qualified, or 
staff, except for the officer’s qualification level.”  Finally, 
the Air Force Officer Classification Directory provides Air 
Force policy regarding use of the “M” prefix, Medical Service 
Specialist:

“Prefix M identifies officers certified by an appropriate 
American Specialty Board or other board acceptable to the Air 
Force Surgeon General.  See AFI 41-104, Professional Board and 
National Certification Examinations, for a list of approved 
boards and certification procedures for award of prefix M.  Do 
not use prefix on manning documents.  Do not affix to the Duty 
AFSC of officers. [Emphasis added] Award and affix to the 
awarded AFSC (primary, second, or third) in which the officer 
has received certification.  [Emphasis added] Delete this prefix 
upon award of prefix H.  In the medical career area, use only 
with qualified (4XX3X) awarded AFSCs.”

The applicant’s duty history (captures duty AFSC, start date for 
that duty entry and the individual’s duty title (not specialty 
title) from the Military Personnel Data System (MilPDS) covering 
her career.

Only complete years and months of service are used to determine 
the periods of service.  Note:  The M prefix was not authorized 
for inclusion in the authorized AFSC on manning documents or for 
the medical officer’s DAFSC.  This exclusion then extends to 
applicant’s duty history and the DD Form 214, block 11.

The complete AFPC/DPSIC evaluation, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit B.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 15 September 2014, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was 
forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 
30 days (Exhibit C).  As of this date, no response has been 
received by this office. 








THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice warranting 
partial relief.  We took note of the applicant’s complete 
submission in judging the merits of the case and agree with 
AFPC/DPSIC recommendation and adopt their rationale as the basis 
for our conclusion that the applicant has been the victim of an 
error or injustice.   As such, we recommend her records be 
corrected to the extent indicated below. 


THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that the DD 
Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, 
issued in conjunction with her 31 October 2013 separation, be 
amended in Item 11, Primary Specialty, to include 46S3, 
Operating Room Nurse, 19 years and 2 months; 46N3, Clinical 
Nurse, 5 years and 11 months and 46A3 Nursing Administration, 2 
years and 10 months.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-05840 in Executive Session on 6 November 2014, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:


All members voted to correct the records, as recommended.  The 
following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 11 December 2013.
    Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIC, dated 14 February 2014,
                w/atchs.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 September 2014.

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04966

    Original file (BC 2013 04966.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04966 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, Block 11, Primary Specialty, be amended to reflect Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) “T2A573A, Instructor, 2005 to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01591

    Original file (BC-2003-01591.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Her Officer Selection Brief (OSB) for the CY02B Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board be corrected to reflect her correct Duty Air Force Specialty Code (DAFSC) and that she receive Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel for the CY02B Selection Board. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 8 August 2003, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02785

    Original file (BC-2003-02785.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    ______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAMM states that a review of the applicant’s duty title shows her duty titles dated 3 June 1999 to 3 September 2002 are reflected exactly as they are on OPRs provided for reference. They also agree that the applicant’s Master’s Degree in Anesthesia should have been reflected on her OSB, and that she be considered for promotion to the grade of colonel by Special Selection Board for the CY02B selection...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01181

    Original file (BC-2003-01181.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Applicant’s OSB for the CY02B board dated 4 November 2002 incorrectly shows the “M” prefix on her “Duty” AFSC under “Assignment History.” Further, applicant submitted copies of her Officer Preselection Brief (OPB) dated 23 July 2003 for the CY02B board which indicates a duty title on 4 February 2001 as “Ambulatory Procedures/Nurse Anesthetist Chief” which was not shown on her OSB when meeting the CY02B board. Based on AFPC/DPAMF2’s advisory and the evidence provided, they recommend SSB...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03959

    Original file (BC 2013 03959.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    According to an SAF/MRBR Action Request, dated 31 Jul 14, the applicant’s DD Form 214, Block 15b, Commissioned through ROTC Scholarship, will be administratively corrected to reflect “Yes.” AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DPSIT recommends denial of the applicant’s request to add the Space and Missile Intelligence Formal Training course to her DD Form 214. The Office of Primary Responsibility (OPR) for the DD Form 214, using the regulatory guidance for the DD Form 214 content at the time of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03202

    Original file (BC 2013 03202.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03202 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility, which are attached at Exhibits C and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04891

    Original file (BC 2013 04891.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The complete DPSIC evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DPSIC’s recommendation is based on the information from his VMET, which does not display the correct amount of time that he worked as a dog handler. The Board can review his Military Working Dog Handler's Certificate, dated 8 January 2010. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that the DD Form 214,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02168

    Original file (BC 2014 02168.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02168 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect the following: Block 11, Primary Specialty, be changed to reflect he served as a Military Training Leader for four years and as 3A051 for four years. The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04057

    Original file (BC 2013 04057.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibilities (OPRs) which are included at Exhibits C, D, E and F. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: USAF/A3O-AIF recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the award of the Aeronautical Badge because she did not have at least 36 months of operational flying to be permanently awarded the Aircrew Member Badge. In accordance with Air Force Instruction 36-3203,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03337

    Original file (BC 2013 03337.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPAPP requested the applicant’s DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect Indochina Service as “Yes.” ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIC recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change the decedent’s Primary Specialty Number and Title. DPSIC states that Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) 42372 and the AFSC title (Aircrew Egress Systems Repairmen), captured on the decedent’s DD Form 214 were correct at the time of his 23 Jun 1977...